What Derivatives Positioning Can Tell Us About The Bitcoin Market
An overview of the perpetual futures and options market for bitcoin and ethereum in the context of previous market cycles.
For those who missed Friday’s announcement, we have some exciting changes coming to Bitcoin Magazine PRO!
It is our goal to provide you with the best possible insights to navigate the market and to do that, we believe it is important to have skin in the game.
With this in mind, we are happy to announce the addition of Dr. Jeff Ross who will be managing the new Bitcoin Magazine PRO Fund beginning in early September!
Dr. Jeff has extensive experience managing capital through his firm Vailshire Capital Management and is a highly-respected voice in the Bitcoin space. He will be making long/short calls, actively managing risk, and giving you actionable trade ideas, all while updating you on the performance of the Bitcoin Magazine PRO Fund.
Paid subscribers will receive these updates, in-depth market commentary from our research team, and will continue to receive early access to our monthly market research reports as they are released.
We will continue to release details as the launch approaches, thank you for supporting Bitcoin Magazine PRO!
Options and Derivatives Update
One dynamic and chart we’ve covered extensively before is bitcoin’s perpetual futures market funding rate compared to price. In the previous 2021 bull run, the perpetual (perps) futures market played a key role in moving short-term prices to both the upside and downside with excessive leverage. It’s worth reviewing the state of the derivatives market and the system’s current leverage as bitcoin price has broken down from its latest rally, following U.S. equities on a potential path towards new lows.
Since the top in November 2021, the perpetual futures market has been consistently biased towards the downside (neutral funding rate is 0.10%). Simply put, more of the market participants were and still are biased short over the last eight months. Even during the latest bear market rally move, that hasn’t changed. We didn’t see the funding rate go above neutral territory showing a clear sign that long speculators and risk appetite have not returned to the market.
With the successful launch of a bitcoin futures ETF in U.S. markets last fall, along with a general unwind in speculative activity across the bitcoin/cryptocurrency market, perp funding rates have been teetering from a neutral to short bias with much less explosive moves in funding rates. Although derivatives market dynamics have changed, it’s still worth watching for an actionable signal from the perps market where the shorting bias gets heavily offside as it's shown to do throughout history marking significant bottoms. It’s worth noting that in previous bear market cycles (where new incoming spot demand was diminished by willing sellers) funding could stay negative for long periods of time, due to lack of demand to speculate/leverage the asset from the bulls.
Another way to visualize the funding rate is to look at an annualized value with the current negative funding rates yielding an estimated 3.32% for taking a long against the majority of shorts. Since the breakdown in November 2021, the market has yet to get back over the annualized neutral funding rate.
Price has moved with the trend of declining futures market open interest in USD since the market top. That’s easier to see in the second and third charts below which just shows the perps futures market share of all futures open interest. The perps market accounts for the lion’s share of open interest of over 75% and has grown substantially from approximately 65% at the start of 2021.
With the amount of leverage available in the perps market, it makes sense why perps market activity has such a large impact on price. Using a rough calculation of the total perps market volume from Glassnode of $26.5 billion per day (7-day moving average) versus Messari’s real spot volume (7-day moving average adjusting for inflated exchange volumes) of $5.7 billion, the perps market trades nearly five times the volume to spot markets. On top of that, daily spot volume is down nearly 40% from last year, a statistic to help understand just how much liquidity has left the market.
Given the volume of the bitcoin derivative contracts relative to spot markets, one may arrive at the conclusion that derivatives can be used to suppress bitcoin. We actually disagree, given the dynamically priced interest rate associated with bitcoin futures products, we believe that on a long enough time frame the effect of derivatives is net neutral on price. While bitcoin likely exploded much higher than it otherwise would have due to the reflexive effects of leverage, those positions eventually were forced to close, thus an equal negative reaction was absorbed by the market.
Markets outside of bitcoin can give us a better idea of excess leverage and speculation build-up in the larger ecosystem. What we’ve seen during Ethereum’s 130%-plus rise from candle wick lows in just under two months is a substantial rise in stablecoin open interest. Nearly all market participants wanted to get long the Merge, cover shorts and take bets. Now, we’re seeing an unwind of some of that euphoria as the Merge narrative faces an equities market selling off again.
Although not as significant, you could see some of the leverage and speculation building across many alternative cryptocurrencies as “alt season” calls and euphoria started to take over again. Bear market rallies have to be convincing to many to lure in as much liquidity as possible (wrecking both shorts and longs on its path) and that’s exactly how the rally has played out so far.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Bitcoin Magazine Pro™ to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.